Freshman Composition

 

Bobby

Page history last edited by Bobby Boyd 3 yrs ago

Bobby Boyd

English 102

Professor Alisa Cooper

 

 

 

Hydrogen Makes Sense for America

 

Issue:

As the population in America increases so does its energy and transportation needs.

 

  • Fossil fuels are providing around 90 percent of the world’s commercial energy supply.
  • Fossil fuels are coal, oil, and natural gas and are burned to release energy.
  • Fossil fuels are considered a non-renewable resource.
  • Fossil fuels used for transportation create the biggest need for a cleaner alternative worldwide.

 


 

 

So What's Wrong with Oil??

America’s reliability on fossil fuel for energy, such as gasoline, is proven to be hazardous to people and the environment.

 

  • The by-products of today's fuel: Carbon Dioxide and Nitrous Oxide.
  • America needs renewable resources.
  • Oil will not last forever.
  • Foriegn dependency for oil cause problems.

 


 

 

 

My Position:

Hydrogen would be a safe and ecologically sound solution for America

  • The only source that emits no pollutants and is up to 45 percent more efficient than gasoline.
  • Since it is primarily derived from water through electrolysis, it is an abundant and reliable resource for energy production.
  • Hydrogen fuel has similar applications to fossil fuels such as residential, business, and transportation.
  • Renewable resources are those that can be re-used and are considered environmentally safe.
  • Hydrogen is a renewable resource.
  • Hydrogen combustion produces steam.

 


 

 

So What is Electrolysis??

  • Electrolysis is defined as the decomposition or separation of a chemical system using direct electric current (Electrolysis).
  • Electrolysis uses metal plates and power to derive hydrogen from plain old tap water.
  • Making hydrogen requires energy.
  • Solar hydrogen is the cleanest because it uses the sun's energy to derive the gas.

 


 

 

Opposition:

  • Opposition claims that hydrogen use would create more pollution to produce the hydrogen.

 

Pollution abatement is easier at a production facility as opposed to millions of cars and homes.

Hydrogen can also be produced on site and as needed without harmful impact.

  • Some also argue that today’s new vehicles are efficient enough and make less harmful emissions while burning gasoline.

 

While newer vehicles are more efficient, they still produce harmful emissions.

 

  • well-warranted concerns of explosion risk are also a concern to some people.

 

If produced on-demand, very little hyrogen would be stored reducing this risk.

 


 

 

Hydrogen technology, as a fuel source, is proven and requires public and private demand for its employment. This demand would need to come from power generating facilities, automakers and homebuilders. Ultimately, the public needs to recognize the use of hydrogen as a powerful and renewable energy source. The benefits that consumers would gain would be in the form of clean air, decreased medical problems associated with pollution and a significant reduction on foreign oil dependency.

 


 

 

 

Literature and Useful Sources:

 

National Hydrogen Association. “The Basics.” 28 Feb. 2006 http://www.hydrogenus.com

 

The White House. “Fact Sheet: Hydrogen Fuel: a Clean and Secure Energy Future.” February 2003 http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/energy/

 

Schwela, Dietrich, and Olivier Zali, eds. Urban Traffic Pollution. London: E & FN Spon, 1999. Pg. 3 (Statistical source.)

Video of a hydrogen engine and plans to build a hydrogen car

http://spiritofmaat.com/archive/watercar/h20car2.htm

Easy hydrogen device

http://www.exo.net/~emuller/activities/electrolysis_device.pdf

 

Questions Forum

For questions or comments related to this Wiki, please E-mail me at:

Findmebb@yahoo.com

Comments (6)

robert splaine said

at 8:55 am on May 1, 2006

Nice page. But "Hydrogen Makes 'since' for America?" I think you have a misspelling there

Cindy said

at 10:17 am on May 1, 2006

Good wiki page. I like your arguments and think that it makes sense in the long run for America and probably the whole world. I think it would definitely end the big oil controversy that we have going on right now. :) One question though...how would it be implemented...as in what would happen to the millions of people who have gasoline powered cars who can't afford a new hydrogen car?

ramona garza said

at 11:11 am on May 1, 2006

Great Job! I am impressed with the presentation. I have learned something about H2, thanks for doing a good job on your research.

Bobby Boyd said

at 4:51 pm on May 1, 2006

Thanks for all the input! There are many opinions related to fueling the future. Most of the current "alternative fuels" are based apon fossil fuels and are not renewable. Electric vehicles are really limited because of the current battery technology and their lack of milage. Hydrogen fuel would be a huge impact on society but would require many changes moving forward in its use. Whenever you hear about future energy development, listen, learn and believe that there are better ways to power America!

shadpalmer said

at 11:53 am on May 2, 2006

Great presentation and very informative. Your research is outstanding. Please keep informing people on the subject.

brian said

at 5:04 pm on May 3, 2006

I have been really curious about this subject as well, your report was very informative. Seems to me like these cars are a ways away from being the mainstream. The world is going to be a mess when the fossil fuels run out

You don't have permission to comment on this page.